Senin, 31 Oktober 2005
Michael Fumento: Fill 'er Up with Oil Sands!
Michael Fumento: Fill 'er Up with Oil Sands!: "Fill 'er Up with Oil Sands!"
TCS: Tech Central Station - Fill 'er Up with Oils Sands!
TCS: Tech Central Station - Fill 'er Up with Oils Sands!: "Fill 'er Up with Oils Sands!
By Michael Fumento Published 10/31/2005
E-Mail Bookmark Print Save
TCS
It was a tenet of the late great economist Julian Simon that we'll never run out of any commodity. That's because before we do the increasing scarcity of that resource will drive up the price and force us to adopt alternatives. For example, as firewood grew scarce people turned to coal, and as the whale oil supply dwindled 'twas petroleum that saved the whales.
Now we're told we're running out of petroleum. The 'proof' is the high prices at the pump. In fact, oil cost about 50% more per barrel in 1979-80 than now when adjusted for inflation. Yet it's also true that industrializing nations like China and India are making serious demands on the world's ability to provide oil and are driving prices up. So is this the beginning of the end?
Nope. The Julian Simon effect is already occurring."
(Full Story)
By Michael Fumento Published 10/31/2005
E-Mail Bookmark Print Save
TCS
It was a tenet of the late great economist Julian Simon that we'll never run out of any commodity. That's because before we do the increasing scarcity of that resource will drive up the price and force us to adopt alternatives. For example, as firewood grew scarce people turned to coal, and as the whale oil supply dwindled 'twas petroleum that saved the whales.
Now we're told we're running out of petroleum. The 'proof' is the high prices at the pump. In fact, oil cost about 50% more per barrel in 1979-80 than now when adjusted for inflation. Yet it's also true that industrializing nations like China and India are making serious demands on the world's ability to provide oil and are driving prices up. So is this the beginning of the end?
Nope. The Julian Simon effect is already occurring."
(Full Story)
Suitcase Bombs- No Way!!
"I have known since being trained as a nuclear target analyst in 1983 (and remaining current through my 1995 retirement from the Army) that there is no such thing as “suitcase nuke.” The term refers to an atomic bomb that is small enough to fit in the space of a suitcase and is therefore presumably approximately as portable as a suitcase.
There was such a thing as atomic demolition munitions and I was trained in how to compute their use against targets such as bridgeheads or to create obstacles by filling a valley with displaced earth. ADMs were indeed man portable, but not easily and certainly not by only one man. Their utility (such as it might have been) was obviated with the invention of terminal-guided missiles such as a late variant of Lance, cruise missiles and GPS-guided weapons.
So I am glad to see today’s piece in OpinonJournal busting the myths about so-called “suitcase nukes.” Not a short read, it is thorough at explaining why suitcase nukes don’t exist. It isn’t simply a matter of engineering challenges, which given enough time and money could be overcome. Read it all!
There was such a thing as atomic demolition munitions and I was trained in how to compute their use against targets such as bridgeheads or to create obstacles by filling a valley with displaced earth. ADMs were indeed man portable, but not easily and certainly not by only one man. Their utility (such as it might have been) was obviated with the invention of terminal-guided missiles such as a late variant of Lance, cruise missiles and GPS-guided weapons.
So I am glad to see today’s piece in OpinonJournal busting the myths about so-called “suitcase nukes.” Not a short read, it is thorough at explaining why suitcase nukes don’t exist. It isn’t simply a matter of engineering challenges, which given enough time and money could be overcome. Read it all!
Jumat, 28 Oktober 2005
Power Line: Continental drift
Power Line: Continental drift: "Continental drift
Every three months I announce that the Claremont Review of Books is my favorite magazine -- every three months because the magazine is a quarterly. CRB is the flagship publication of the Claremont Institute, the organization whose mission it is to restore the principles of the American Founding to their rightful, preeminent authority in our national life. See, for example, today's astringent column by CRB editor Charles Kesler on the matter of Harriet Miers: 'Bush's philosophy.'
The magazine is also popular in the White House and the Pentagon; 30 copies of each new issue are shipped out by overnight mail to the White House upon publication, and a dozen to the Pentagon. If you don't subscribe, you should.
The institute has just announced that Mark Steyn will receive the 2005 Henry Salvatori Prize at its annual dinner in honor of Sir Winston S. Churchill. The event will be held on Friday, December 2, 2005 at the Regent Beverly Wilshire Hotel in Beverly Hills, California.
The fall issue of the CRB is in the mail. As usual, it is packed full of outstanding essays and thoughtful reviews of books on mostly political subjects. Among the rewards of my enthususiasm for the magazine is the privilege of debuting a few of the items from the issue exclusively on Power Line.
Cornell University Government Professor Jeremy Rabkin has become a unique resource on issues of national sovereignty, international law and the related constellation of issues implicit in the 'We Are The World' thrust of the modern Democratic Party. Professor Rabkin is the author most recently of Law Without Nations? Why Constitutional Government Requires Sovereign States. Among the featured essays in the current CRB issue is Professor Rabkin's essay on the European Union: 'Continental drift.'
Imagine if our agricultural policy were made in Ecuador with agricultural ministers from all over the Hemisphere, our taxes paid for housing in Canada, and Paraguayan judges ruled on our immigration policy —- oh, and the American voter really had no say about any of it. Then you’d have something like the New World counterpart to the European Union. It wouldn’t work very well. It doesn’t for Europe. So what is Europe’s fate? Why did the European constitution fail? What does a constitution do, anyway? These are the questions to which Professor Rabkin addresses himself in this invigorating essay."
Every three months I announce that the Claremont Review of Books is my favorite magazine -- every three months because the magazine is a quarterly. CRB is the flagship publication of the Claremont Institute, the organization whose mission it is to restore the principles of the American Founding to their rightful, preeminent authority in our national life. See, for example, today's astringent column by CRB editor Charles Kesler on the matter of Harriet Miers: 'Bush's philosophy.'
The magazine is also popular in the White House and the Pentagon; 30 copies of each new issue are shipped out by overnight mail to the White House upon publication, and a dozen to the Pentagon. If you don't subscribe, you should.
The institute has just announced that Mark Steyn will receive the 2005 Henry Salvatori Prize at its annual dinner in honor of Sir Winston S. Churchill. The event will be held on Friday, December 2, 2005 at the Regent Beverly Wilshire Hotel in Beverly Hills, California.
The fall issue of the CRB is in the mail. As usual, it is packed full of outstanding essays and thoughtful reviews of books on mostly political subjects. Among the rewards of my enthususiasm for the magazine is the privilege of debuting a few of the items from the issue exclusively on Power Line.
Cornell University Government Professor Jeremy Rabkin has become a unique resource on issues of national sovereignty, international law and the related constellation of issues implicit in the 'We Are The World' thrust of the modern Democratic Party. Professor Rabkin is the author most recently of Law Without Nations? Why Constitutional Government Requires Sovereign States. Among the featured essays in the current CRB issue is Professor Rabkin's essay on the European Union: 'Continental drift.'
Imagine if our agricultural policy were made in Ecuador with agricultural ministers from all over the Hemisphere, our taxes paid for housing in Canada, and Paraguayan judges ruled on our immigration policy —- oh, and the American voter really had no say about any of it. Then you’d have something like the New World counterpart to the European Union. It wouldn’t work very well. It doesn’t for Europe. So what is Europe’s fate? Why did the European constitution fail? What does a constitution do, anyway? These are the questions to which Professor Rabkin addresses himself in this invigorating essay."
Americans won't let Democrats lose Iraq - Los Angeles Times
Americans won't let Democrats lose Iraq - Los Angeles Times: "A FEW DAYS AGO, Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) made a speech urging the U.S., in effect, to get out of Iraq the way we got out of Vietnam.
Leahy told the Senate that we cannot win in Iraq. 'It has become increasingly apparent that the most powerful army in the world cannot stop a determined insurgency.' (U.S. troops, Iraqi troops, long-suffering Iraqi civilians to Leahy: Thanks, senator, we needed that.) And Leahy announced that the president must lay out a public formula to tell the world just when U.S. troops will leave Iraq. Otherwise, Leahy said, he will urge the Senate to choke off the war by refusing to fund it. That's how the U.S. finally lost Vietnam: Congress snuffed out the money.
"
Leahy told the Senate that we cannot win in Iraq. 'It has become increasingly apparent that the most powerful army in the world cannot stop a determined insurgency.' (U.S. troops, Iraqi troops, long-suffering Iraqi civilians to Leahy: Thanks, senator, we needed that.) And Leahy announced that the president must lay out a public formula to tell the world just when U.S. troops will leave Iraq. Otherwise, Leahy said, he will urge the Senate to choke off the war by refusing to fund it. That's how the U.S. finally lost Vietnam: Congress snuffed out the money.
"
Kamis, 27 Oktober 2005
EconoPundit
EconoPundit: "New Orleans: A Geopolitical Prize
By George Friedman
...
During the Cold War, a macabre topic of discussion among bored graduate students who studied such things was this: If the Soviets could destroy one city with a large nuclear device, which would it be? The usual answers were Washington or New York. For me, the answer was simple: New Orleans. If the Mississippi River was shut to traffic, then the foundations of the economy would be shattered. The industrial minerals needed in the factories wouldn't come in, and the agricultural wealth wouldn't flow out. Alternative routes really weren't available. The Germans knew it too: A U-boat campaign occurred near the mouth of the Mississippi during World War II. Both the Germans and Stratfor have stood with Andy Jackson: New Orleans was the prize.
Last Sunday, nature took out New Orleans almost as surely as a nuclear strike. Hurricane Katrina's geopolitical effect was not, in many ways, distinguishable from a mushroom cloud. The key exit from North America was closed. The petrochemical industry, which has become an added value to the region since Jackson's days, was at risk. The navigability of the Mississippi south of New Orleans was a question mark. New Orleans as a city and as a port complex had ceased to exist, and it was not clear that it could recover.
The Ports of South Louisiana and New Orleans, which run north and south of the city, are as important today as at any point during the history of the republic. On its own merit, POSL is the largest port in the United States by tonnage and the fifth-largest in the world. It exports more than 52 million tons a year, of which more than half are agricultural products -- corn, soybeans and so on. A large proportion of U.S. agriculture flows out of the port. Almost as much cargo, nearly 17 million tons, comes in through the port -- including not only crude oil, but chemicals and fertilizers, coal, concrete and so on...
The oil fields, pipelines and ports required a skilled workforce in order to operate. That workforce requires homes. They require stores to buy food and other supplies. Hospitals and doctors. Schools for their children. In other words, in order to operate the facilities critical to the United States, you need a workforce to do it -- and that workforce is gone. Unlike in other disasters, that workforce cannot return to the region because they have no place to live. New Orleans is gone, and the metropolitan area surrounding New Orleans is either gone or so badly damaged that it will not be inhabitable for a long time...
The displacement of population is the crisis that New Orleans faces. It is also a national crisis, because the largest port in the United States cannot function without a city around it. The physical and business processes of a port cannot occur in a ghost town, and right now, that is what New Orleans is. It is not about the facilities, and it is not about the oil. It is about the loss of a city's population and the paralysis of the largest port in the United States...
To summarize: this is very likely much more than a massive human refugee crisis. It may be the first stage of an international economic crisis as well."
By George Friedman
...
During the Cold War, a macabre topic of discussion among bored graduate students who studied such things was this: If the Soviets could destroy one city with a large nuclear device, which would it be? The usual answers were Washington or New York. For me, the answer was simple: New Orleans. If the Mississippi River was shut to traffic, then the foundations of the economy would be shattered. The industrial minerals needed in the factories wouldn't come in, and the agricultural wealth wouldn't flow out. Alternative routes really weren't available. The Germans knew it too: A U-boat campaign occurred near the mouth of the Mississippi during World War II. Both the Germans and Stratfor have stood with Andy Jackson: New Orleans was the prize.
Last Sunday, nature took out New Orleans almost as surely as a nuclear strike. Hurricane Katrina's geopolitical effect was not, in many ways, distinguishable from a mushroom cloud. The key exit from North America was closed. The petrochemical industry, which has become an added value to the region since Jackson's days, was at risk. The navigability of the Mississippi south of New Orleans was a question mark. New Orleans as a city and as a port complex had ceased to exist, and it was not clear that it could recover.
The Ports of South Louisiana and New Orleans, which run north and south of the city, are as important today as at any point during the history of the republic. On its own merit, POSL is the largest port in the United States by tonnage and the fifth-largest in the world. It exports more than 52 million tons a year, of which more than half are agricultural products -- corn, soybeans and so on. A large proportion of U.S. agriculture flows out of the port. Almost as much cargo, nearly 17 million tons, comes in through the port -- including not only crude oil, but chemicals and fertilizers, coal, concrete and so on...
The oil fields, pipelines and ports required a skilled workforce in order to operate. That workforce requires homes. They require stores to buy food and other supplies. Hospitals and doctors. Schools for their children. In other words, in order to operate the facilities critical to the United States, you need a workforce to do it -- and that workforce is gone. Unlike in other disasters, that workforce cannot return to the region because they have no place to live. New Orleans is gone, and the metropolitan area surrounding New Orleans is either gone or so badly damaged that it will not be inhabitable for a long time...
The displacement of population is the crisis that New Orleans faces. It is also a national crisis, because the largest port in the United States cannot function without a city around it. The physical and business processes of a port cannot occur in a ghost town, and right now, that is what New Orleans is. It is not about the facilities, and it is not about the oil. It is about the loss of a city's population and the paralysis of the largest port in the United States...
To summarize: this is very likely much more than a massive human refugee crisis. It may be the first stage of an international economic crisis as well."
Rabu, 26 Oktober 2005
Hammorabi on Syria
Syria on the verge of new era
The death of the interior Minister of Syria who was the main Syrian figure directly involved in Lebanon for long time is of no doubt related to the ongoing investigations about the Syrian role in the death of Rafiq Hariri.
Irrespective of whether the death was by suicide or some one kills him the investigations of Hariri’s death should be extended to include the death of the Syrian Interior Minister.
It has been shown for long time now that Syria knows only one language which is to kill its opponents and to create a scene of bloodshed both in Iraq and Lebanon as well as against its own people. In Iraq they train, support, recruit and help the terrorists. They set out camps for such training and provide multiple logistic supports. The evidence given by those who were captured including Syrian officers needs no explanation. However they deny it on the highest level and blamed the Americans of not cooperating with them like in discussion or in providing equipments to facilitate observation of the borders.
In Lebanon there were many deaths among Syrian opposition figures since the murder of Hariri. Many Lebanese were forced to leave for more safe regions like Paris including the sons of Hariri himself.
It is so surprising that the Syrian Baath regime digging for itself a big and deep hole. On the other hand the Syrian people are now awaiting the moment to escape from the long-lasting dictatorship regime.
The above article was written about few days ago and not published due to a priorty for other matters. Today the report of Detlev Mehlis the chief investigator in Rafiq Hariri assassination was handed over to the UN. Not surprisingly at all that the report strongly indicated that top ranking Syrian officials were involved in the assassination. But surprisingly that among those involved were the brother and brother in law of Bashar Al-Asad the president of Syria. He denied in a CNN interview any personal or even low level links. It is very unlikely that if his two brothers were involved that he didn’t knew about it.
If the report is true and proved correct, what will be the position of such a regime in the world and who would be able to sit and make deals with it unless they are alike.
The death of the interior Minister of Syria who was the main Syrian figure directly involved in Lebanon for long time is of no doubt related to the ongoing investigations about the Syrian role in the death of Rafiq Hariri.
Irrespective of whether the death was by suicide or some one kills him the investigations of Hariri’s death should be extended to include the death of the Syrian Interior Minister.
It has been shown for long time now that Syria knows only one language which is to kill its opponents and to create a scene of bloodshed both in Iraq and Lebanon as well as against its own people. In Iraq they train, support, recruit and help the terrorists. They set out camps for such training and provide multiple logistic supports. The evidence given by those who were captured including Syrian officers needs no explanation. However they deny it on the highest level and blamed the Americans of not cooperating with them like in discussion or in providing equipments to facilitate observation of the borders.
In Lebanon there were many deaths among Syrian opposition figures since the murder of Hariri. Many Lebanese were forced to leave for more safe regions like Paris including the sons of Hariri himself.
It is so surprising that the Syrian Baath regime digging for itself a big and deep hole. On the other hand the Syrian people are now awaiting the moment to escape from the long-lasting dictatorship regime.
The above article was written about few days ago and not published due to a priorty for other matters. Today the report of Detlev Mehlis the chief investigator in Rafiq Hariri assassination was handed over to the UN. Not surprisingly at all that the report strongly indicated that top ranking Syrian officials were involved in the assassination. But surprisingly that among those involved were the brother and brother in law of Bashar Al-Asad the president of Syria. He denied in a CNN interview any personal or even low level links. It is very unlikely that if his two brothers were involved that he didn’t knew about it.
If the report is true and proved correct, what will be the position of such a regime in the world and who would be able to sit and make deals with it unless they are alike.
Selasa, 25 Oktober 2005
Anthony de Jasay, Are High Oil Prices a Form of Exploitation: Library of Economics and Liberty
Anthony de Jasay, Are High Oil Prices a Form of Exploitation: Library of Economics and Liberty: "Are High Oil Prices a Form of Exploitation?" That is the question!
Russell Roberts, The Reality of Markets: Library of Economics and Liberty
Russell Roberts, The Reality of Markets: Library of Economics and Liberty: "The Reality of Markets" EXCELLENT READ RE WALLMART and OIL PRICES!
Sabtu, 22 Oktober 2005
Minggu, 16 Oktober 2005
The White House, the CIA, and the Wilsons (theFull Story)
The White House, the CIA, and the Wilsons: "The White House, the CIA, and the Wilsons
The chain of events that gave rise to a grand jury investigation.
by Stephen F. Hayes
10/24/2005, Volume 011, Issue 06 "
The chain of events that gave rise to a grand jury investigation.
by Stephen F. Hayes
10/24/2005, Volume 011, Issue 06 "
The White House, the CIA, and the Wilsons (theFull Story)
The White House, the CIA, and the Wilsons: "The White House, the CIA, and the Wilsons
The chain of events that gave rise to a grand jury investigation.
by Stephen F. Hayes
10/24/2005, Volume 011, Issue 06 "
The chain of events that gave rise to a grand jury investigation.
by Stephen F. Hayes
10/24/2005, Volume 011, Issue 06 "
Sabtu, 15 Oktober 2005
THE MESOPOTAMIAN: Comments!!
THE MESOPOTAMIAN: 10/01/2005 - 10/31/2005: "Here we have the U.S.A. and Great Britain and their smaller friends, an alliance that has defeated Nazi Germany and the mighty Reich, and have had the stomach to obliterate Japanese cities with atomic bombs. Here we have the Americans, the descendants of those who wrested a whole continent by shear obstinacy and fought for every inch of land with blood and sweat. Here we have nations that have waded through rivers of blood and mud and marched through entire continents to become symbols of human perseverance and enterprise. Yes all this history and yet we have some who think that our miserable 'Sunni Triangle' poses an insurmountable problem and that one should 'cut and run' and 'bring home troops immediately' etc. etc.
I salute President Bush who does not care much for this kind of defeatism and treats it with the contempt it deserves."
I salute President Bush who does not care much for this kind of defeatism and treats it with the contempt it deserves."
Jumat, 14 Oktober 2005
Hog On Ice
n top of that, truly brilliant lawyers don't necessarily make good judges. Brilliant people often have poor judgment, and they're often out of touch with society and unable to relate to normal human beings. People like that have no business working as judges. They are basically idiot-savants, and society has generously created havens for them. I am referring to law schools, where they go to serve as professors. Without tenure, they’d be pushing grocery carts up and down the streets, muttering about ERISA.
I would much rather have a 150-IQ justice with common sense than a 180-IQ justice who can't find his way out of his office. Not every job requires genius. Jimmy Carter was almost certainly smarter than Ronald Reagan, but he was a complete buffoon who turned out to be utterly impotent as a leader. I’m a pretty smart guy, and I freely admit I would rather live in Somalia than an American city where I was mayor for life.
I would much rather have a 150-IQ justice with common sense than a 180-IQ justice who can't find his way out of his office. Not every job requires genius. Jimmy Carter was almost certainly smarter than Ronald Reagan, but he was a complete buffoon who turned out to be utterly impotent as a leader. I’m a pretty smart guy, and I freely admit I would rather live in Somalia than an American city where I was mayor for life.
Kamis, 13 Oktober 2005
Hog On Ice
Hog On IceFar and away, the most likely outcome is that Harriet Miers will prove to be extremely intelligent, extraordinarily capable, and well able to equal the feats of geniuses like Ruth Ginsburg and Sandra O'Connor. In my opinion, she has already proven that by making a powerful impression on the highly knowledgeable people who help George Bush pick nominees. If they're wrong, we'll find out during the confirmation hearings. But if she turns out to be incapable of doing the job, believe me, not going to Yale will have nothing to do with it.
More on Lawyers/Har. Miers
Hog On Ice: "I went to an Ivy League school, at least until they threw me out for firing rockets into Morningside Park and setting fire to a dorm room, and I also went to a non-Ivy-League law school. I'm here to tell you, it makes absolutely no difference where a judge goes to college. In fact, it makes no difference where ANYONE goes to college. As a shrewd man once told me, where you went to college matters for two years after you graduate, and after that, nobody asks.
If you went to Harvard Law School, I hate to burst the giant, throbbing bubble which is your ego, but there are two or three people in virtually every law school class who are as smart as you are, or smarter. Every reputable law school admits students--every year--who will prove bright enough and mature enough to sit on the Supreme Court.
Law is just not that hard. Lawyers hate it when I say that, because they want people to think we're as smart as doctors (we are not) but it's true. I did the vast bulk of my work between classes, and I ended up in the top third of my class. In undergraduate physics, for any given course, I did more work in two weeks than I did in ANY law school course for an entire semester. I'm not including brainless work, like hanging around the Legal Aid office, waiting to help with an uncontested divorce. I mean studying."
If you went to Harvard Law School, I hate to burst the giant, throbbing bubble which is your ego, but there are two or three people in virtually every law school class who are as smart as you are, or smarter. Every reputable law school admits students--every year--who will prove bright enough and mature enough to sit on the Supreme Court.
Law is just not that hard. Lawyers hate it when I say that, because they want people to think we're as smart as doctors (we are not) but it's true. I did the vast bulk of my work between classes, and I ended up in the top third of my class. In undergraduate physics, for any given course, I did more work in two weeks than I did in ANY law school course for an entire semester. I'm not including brainless work, like hanging around the Legal Aid office, waiting to help with an uncontested divorce. I mean studying."
Earthquakes etc Poor countries
EconoPundit: "Tens of thousands are killed when earthquakes strike poor countries. Only dozens are killed when the same quakes hit richer countries. We grieve for the dead and injured in Pakistan, but one needs to remember Pakistan is a nation that has spent, for every dollar on poor peoples' earthquake-proof housing, untold thousands or more on nuclear arms.
As anyone can confirm from this web site each year we buy about $2.9 billion from Pakistan -- most of it textiles we could easily produce right here at home -- while Pakistan reciprocates by importing only $1.8 billion in US goods. The deficit is minor compared with total GDP (less than 0.01%) but in real life terms it translates into thousands of lost US jobs.
Some of the taxes going to earthquake relief come right out of the pockets of workers displaced by globalization. Exactly how guilty are they and their families supposed to feel?"
As anyone can confirm from this web site each year we buy about $2.9 billion from Pakistan -- most of it textiles we could easily produce right here at home -- while Pakistan reciprocates by importing only $1.8 billion in US goods. The deficit is minor compared with total GDP (less than 0.01%) but in real life terms it translates into thousands of lost US jobs.
Some of the taxes going to earthquake relief come right out of the pockets of workers displaced by globalization. Exactly how guilty are they and their families supposed to feel?"
Senin, 10 Oktober 2005
Minggu, 09 Oktober 2005
Sabtu, 08 Oktober 2005
A Look at Major Earthquakes Last 50 Years
A Look at Major Earthquakes Last 50 Years: "A Look at Major Earthquakes Last 50 Years
By The Associated Press
The Associated Press
Saturday, October 8, 2005; 9:04 AM
-- Major earthquakes around the world since early last century:
_ Oct. 8, 2005: Pakistani Kashmir; magnitude 7.6; hundreds killed.
_ March 28, 2005: Sumatra, Indonesia; magnitude 8.7; up to 1,000 killed.
_ Dec. 26, 2004: Sumatra, Indonesia; magnitude 9.0; more than 176,000 people killed in 11 countries from earthquake and subsequent tsunami.
_ Dec. 26, 2003: Bam, Iran; magnitude 6.5; more than 26,000 killed.
_ May 21, 2003: Northern Algeria; magnitude 6.8; nearly 2,300 killed.
_ March 25, 2002: Northern Afghanistan; magnitude 5.8; up to 1,000 killed.
_ Jan. 26, 2001: India; magnitude 7.9; at least 2,500 killed. Estimates put death toll as high as 13,000.
_ Sept. 21, 1999: Taiwan; magnitude 7.6; 2,400 killed.
_ Aug. 17, 1999: Western Turkey; magnitude 7.4; 17,000 killed.
_ Jan. 25, 1999: Western Colombia; magnitude 6; 1,171 killed.
_ May 30, 1998: Northern Afghanistan and Tajikistan; magnitude 6.9; as many as 5,000 killed.
_ Jan. 17, 1995: Kobe, Japan; magnitude 7.2; more than 6,000 killed.
_ Sept. 30, 1993: Latur, India; magnitude 6.0; as many as 10,000 killed.
_ June 21, 1990: Northwest Iran; magnitude 7.3-7.7; 50,000 killed.
_ Dec. 7, 1988: Northwest Armenia; magnitude 6.9; 25,000 killed.
_ Sept. 19, 1985: Central Mexico; magnitude 8.1; more than 9,500 killed.
_ Sept. 16, 1978: Northeast Iran; magnitude 7.7; 25,000 killed.
_ July 28, 1976: Tangshan, China; magnitude 7.8-8.2; 240,000 killed.
_ Feb. 4, 1976: Guatemala; magnitude 7.5; 22,778 killed.
_ Feb. 29, 1960: Southwest Atlantic coast in Morocco; magnitude 5.7; some 12,000 killed, town of Agadir destroyed."
By The Associated Press
The Associated Press
Saturday, October 8, 2005; 9:04 AM
-- Major earthquakes around the world since early last century:
_ Oct. 8, 2005: Pakistani Kashmir; magnitude 7.6; hundreds killed.
_ March 28, 2005: Sumatra, Indonesia; magnitude 8.7; up to 1,000 killed.
_ Dec. 26, 2004: Sumatra, Indonesia; magnitude 9.0; more than 176,000 people killed in 11 countries from earthquake and subsequent tsunami.
_ Dec. 26, 2003: Bam, Iran; magnitude 6.5; more than 26,000 killed.
_ May 21, 2003: Northern Algeria; magnitude 6.8; nearly 2,300 killed.
_ March 25, 2002: Northern Afghanistan; magnitude 5.8; up to 1,000 killed.
_ Jan. 26, 2001: India; magnitude 7.9; at least 2,500 killed. Estimates put death toll as high as 13,000.
_ Sept. 21, 1999: Taiwan; magnitude 7.6; 2,400 killed.
_ Aug. 17, 1999: Western Turkey; magnitude 7.4; 17,000 killed.
_ Jan. 25, 1999: Western Colombia; magnitude 6; 1,171 killed.
_ May 30, 1998: Northern Afghanistan and Tajikistan; magnitude 6.9; as many as 5,000 killed.
_ Jan. 17, 1995: Kobe, Japan; magnitude 7.2; more than 6,000 killed.
_ Sept. 30, 1993: Latur, India; magnitude 6.0; as many as 10,000 killed.
_ June 21, 1990: Northwest Iran; magnitude 7.3-7.7; 50,000 killed.
_ Dec. 7, 1988: Northwest Armenia; magnitude 6.9; 25,000 killed.
_ Sept. 19, 1985: Central Mexico; magnitude 8.1; more than 9,500 killed.
_ Sept. 16, 1978: Northeast Iran; magnitude 7.7; 25,000 killed.
_ July 28, 1976: Tangshan, China; magnitude 7.8-8.2; 240,000 killed.
_ Feb. 4, 1976: Guatemala; magnitude 7.5; 22,778 killed.
_ Feb. 29, 1960: Southwest Atlantic coast in Morocco; magnitude 5.7; some 12,000 killed, town of Agadir destroyed."
Kamis, 06 Oktober 2005
Term Limits for Supreme Justices?
Power Line: Reaching our limits: "Reaching our limits
Peggy Noonan has a long, insightful column about the Miers nomination. She concludes by advocating term limits for Supreme Court Justices.
I've supported such term limits, and the Roberts confirmation process coupled with the Miers nomination throws the case for them into sharper relief. Under the current rules of engagement (the Ginsburg precedent), nominees refuse to tell the Senate and the public much about what they are likely to do on the bench. And the large number of Democrats willing to vote against Roberts on ideological grounds increases the incentive for presidents to nominate individuals who haven't publicly said much about constitutional issues. Finally, Miers notwithstanding, we can expect relatively young nominees going forward.
In short, we are getting less and less information about individuals who are likely to serve on the Court for longer and longer periods of time in an era when the Court has never been more important. In this perfect storm, the case for term limits seems overwhelming, and my skepticism about the possibility of enacting them is diminishing a bit. Whatever happens to Miers (and I'm pretty sure she will be confirmed), the process will leave a bad taste in the mouth of many Senators on both sides."
Peggy Noonan has a long, insightful column about the Miers nomination. She concludes by advocating term limits for Supreme Court Justices.
I've supported such term limits, and the Roberts confirmation process coupled with the Miers nomination throws the case for them into sharper relief. Under the current rules of engagement (the Ginsburg precedent), nominees refuse to tell the Senate and the public much about what they are likely to do on the bench. And the large number of Democrats willing to vote against Roberts on ideological grounds increases the incentive for presidents to nominate individuals who haven't publicly said much about constitutional issues. Finally, Miers notwithstanding, we can expect relatively young nominees going forward.
In short, we are getting less and less information about individuals who are likely to serve on the Court for longer and longer periods of time in an era when the Court has never been more important. In this perfect storm, the case for term limits seems overwhelming, and my skepticism about the possibility of enacting them is diminishing a bit. Whatever happens to Miers (and I'm pretty sure she will be confirmed), the process will leave a bad taste in the mouth of many Senators on both sides."
Guardian Unlimited Technology | Technology | Breaking America's grip on the net
Guardian Unlimited Technology | Technology | Breaking America's grip on the net: "After troubled negotiations in Geneva, the US may be forced to relinquish control of the internet to a coalition of governments "
READ IT HERE!
READ IT HERE!
BREITBART.COM - Just The News
BREITBART.COM - Just The News: "Here is the text of former Vice President Al Gore's remarks at the We"
Good speach !
Good speach !
Rabu, 05 Oktober 2005
Energy Prob Solved
EconoPundit
How to achieve full energy independence in fifteen years...
Here's the EconoPundit national energy policy.
1. Impose an immediate and permanent oil import tax set on a sliding scale between $95/bbl and current world price. If world price is $70, the tax is $25/bbl. If world price sinks to $35, the tax automatically rises to $60/bbl.
This tax is permanent. Energy costs as seen by households and businesses will initially rise substantially but will quickly stabilize and won't fluctuate even one tiny bit from year to year. What now goes "up and down" is import tax revenue, not domestic energy costs. It is possible there are massive cost reductions in many if not all areas of production to be realized if energy costs are permanently and credibly stabilized.
2. Spend some of the new massive revenue on whatever redistribution is necessary to ease the transition to the new economy. Spend some of it on alternative energy and conservation. Spend some of it on lowering other taxes here and there. Heck, I don't care.
3. Spend the rest on speeding the development of domestic recoverable oil shale. James Perry, who provided this link, describes the situation as follows:
The largest known oil shale deposits in the world are in the Green River Formation, which covers portions of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming. Estimates of the oil resource in place within the Green River Formation range from 1.5 to 1.8 trillion barrels. Not all resources in place are recoverable. For potentially recoverable oil shale resources, we roughly derive an upper bound of 1.1 trillion barrels of oil and a lower bound of about 500 billion barrels. For policy planning purposes, it is enough to know that any amount in this range is very high. For example, the midpoint in our estimate range, 800 billion barrels, is more than triple the proven oil reserves of Saudi Arabia.
At current rates of consumption these deposits would keep a U.S. petroleum-based economy going for another 100 years with no oil imports.
How to achieve full energy independence in fifteen years...
Here's the EconoPundit national energy policy.
1. Impose an immediate and permanent oil import tax set on a sliding scale between $95/bbl and current world price. If world price is $70, the tax is $25/bbl. If world price sinks to $35, the tax automatically rises to $60/bbl.
This tax is permanent. Energy costs as seen by households and businesses will initially rise substantially but will quickly stabilize and won't fluctuate even one tiny bit from year to year. What now goes "up and down" is import tax revenue, not domestic energy costs. It is possible there are massive cost reductions in many if not all areas of production to be realized if energy costs are permanently and credibly stabilized.
2. Spend some of the new massive revenue on whatever redistribution is necessary to ease the transition to the new economy. Spend some of it on alternative energy and conservation. Spend some of it on lowering other taxes here and there. Heck, I don't care.
3. Spend the rest on speeding the development of domestic recoverable oil shale. James Perry, who provided this link, describes the situation as follows:
The largest known oil shale deposits in the world are in the Green River Formation, which covers portions of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming. Estimates of the oil resource in place within the Green River Formation range from 1.5 to 1.8 trillion barrels. Not all resources in place are recoverable. For potentially recoverable oil shale resources, we roughly derive an upper bound of 1.1 trillion barrels of oil and a lower bound of about 500 billion barrels. For policy planning purposes, it is enough to know that any amount in this range is very high. For example, the midpoint in our estimate range, 800 billion barrels, is more than triple the proven oil reserves of Saudi Arabia.
At current rates of consumption these deposits would keep a U.S. petroleum-based economy going for another 100 years with no oil imports.
Sabtu, 01 Oktober 2005
Study: Sun's Changes to Blame for Part of Global Warming
Study: Sun's Changes to Blame for Part of Global Warming: "Sun's Changes to Blame for Part of Global Warming
By Robert Roy Britt"
By Robert Roy Britt"
Langganan:
Postingan (Atom)